1960 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1960 AC Aceca. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Aceca.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Aceca | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |