1960 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2010 Nissan Frontier is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,953 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Frontier (257 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1960 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Frontier (281 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Aceca | 2010 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | AC | Nissan |
| Model | Aceca | Frontier |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 3953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 257 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1860 mm |
