1960 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (490 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 367 more horse power than 1960 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (569 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Aceca | 2013 Aston Martin Virage | |
Make | AC | Aston Martin |
Model | Aceca | Virage |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 490 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |