1960 AC Greyhound vs. 1956 AC Aceca
To start off, 1960 AC Greyhound is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. Both 1960 AC Greyhound and 1956 AC Aceca are equipped with a 1,971 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 AC Greyhound weights approximately 125 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 1956 AC Aceca | |
| Make | AC | AC |
| Model | Greyhound | Aceca |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 890 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 59 L |
