1960 AC Greyhound vs. 1958 Austin-Healey 100
To start off, 1960 AC Greyhound is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 1958 Austin-Healey 100 | |
Make | AC | Austin-Healey |
Model | Greyhound | 100 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2639 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 79.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 88.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 54 L |