1960 AC Greyhound vs. 1980 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1980 Lancia Beta is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1980 Lancia Beta. (81 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1980 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 AC Greyhound weights approximately 15 kg more than 1980 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 1980 Lancia Beta | |
| Make | AC | Lancia |
| Model | Greyhound | Beta |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 70.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 78.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 49 L |
