1960 AC Greyhound vs. 1996 Acura RL
To start off, 1996 Acura RL is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura RL (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Acura RL weights approximately 660 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 1996 Acura RL | |
Make | AC | Acura |
Model | Greyhound | RL |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3472 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 91 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |