1960 AC Greyhound vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,266 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (275 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 980 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Greyhound | ML |
Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4266 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |