1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Bristol Blenheim
To start off, 2000 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 725 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2000 Bristol Blenheim | |
Make | AC | Bristol |
Model | Greyhound | Blenheim |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2910 mm |