1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 647 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 172 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Camaro |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 9371 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 770 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 114.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 114.3 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 64 L |