1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Citroen C1
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 AC Greyhound weights approximately 140 kg more than 2000 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2000 Citroen C1 | |
| Make | AC | Citroen |
| Model | Greyhound | C1 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 35 L |
