1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Toyota Avalon
To start off, 2000 Toyota Avalon is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Avalon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Avalon (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Avalon should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Avalon weights approximately 666 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2000 Toyota Avalon | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Greyhound | Avalon |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1681 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |