1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2003 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Thunderbird (249 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 730 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2003 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3934 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 249 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 59 L |