1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1500 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | AC | Land Rover |
Model | Greyhound | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 82.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 100 L |