1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Roadster weights approximately 15 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Greyhound | Roadster |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 83.6 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 48 L |