1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Greyhound (123 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 AC Greyhound weights approximately 45 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | AC | MCC |
Model | Greyhound | Smart |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 73 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84.8 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 47 L |