1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,438 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 480 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Greyhound | Condor |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2438 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 86 mm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1495 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |
