1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Audi A2
To start off, 2004 Audi A2 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2004 Audi A2. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 AC Greyhound weights approximately 85 kg more than 2004 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2004 Audi A2 | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Greyhound | A2 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1190 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 34 L |
