1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,970 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1466 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Greyhound | Express |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 92 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2481 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2080 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 117 L |
