1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (210 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 448 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Greyhound | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 89.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1463 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |