1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Mustang |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 435 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1860 mm |