1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2008 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 384 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2008 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Greyhound | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |