1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2008 Ford Shelby GT 500
To start off, 2008 Ford Shelby GT 500 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford Shelby GT 500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Shelby GT 500 (500 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 377 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Shelby GT 500 should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Shelby GT 500 weights approximately 62 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2008 Ford Shelby GT 500 | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Greyhound | Shelby GT 500 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5409 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 500 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1077 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |
