1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | AC | Mazda |
| Model | Greyhound | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 76 L |
