1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Chrysler Aspen
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (345 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 895 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2009 Chrysler Aspen | |
| Make | AC | Chrysler |
| Model | Greyhound | Aspen |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5653 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 102 L |
