1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Greyhound | 3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2260 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 94 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |