1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt. (54 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 435 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2009 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Greyhound | Colt |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 54 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 47 L |