1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 AC Greyhound weights approximately 415 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2009 Tata Nano | |
| Make | AC | Tata |
| Model | Greyhound | Nano |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 37 L |
