1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1597 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | Greyhound | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 403 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2612 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5662 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1918 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 117 L |
