1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 348 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Greyhound | 3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1363 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |