1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (272 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 594 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Greyhound | 6 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |