1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 384 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 895 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Greyhound | CLS |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 507 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4917 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2855 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |
