1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2011 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2011 Mazda Tribute is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda Tribute (240 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 525 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2011 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | AC | Mazda |
| Model | Greyhound | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6550 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4442 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 66 L |
