1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 585 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Greyhound | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |
