1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | AC | Mazda |
| Model | Greyhound | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 102 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |
