1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 535 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2012 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Greyhound | Colt |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 47 L |