1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (327 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1771 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Greyhound | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2947 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 95 L |