1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1544 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Avalanche |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 316 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2559 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5621 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1946 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 119 L |