1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (222 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1596 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Greyhound | E-Series |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2611 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2085 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 150 L |
