1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2013 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2013 Nissan Armada is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Armada (313 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1637 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 2013 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | AC | Nissan |
| Model | Greyhound | Armada |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 313 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5276 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2014 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1981 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 105 L |
