1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. (101 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 880 kg more than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. (113 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | Giulietta | Dakota |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 957 kg | 1837 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 83 L |