1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta vs. 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser (235 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. (101 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 1488 kg more than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser (434 Nm) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta. (113 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Alfa Romeo Giulietta | 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | Giulietta | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 957 kg | 2445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 96 L |