1960 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 1997 Isuzu 3.1
To start off, 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 | 1997 Isuzu 3.1 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Isuzu |
| Model | DBR2 | 3.1 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4164 cc | 3098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
