1960 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. (311 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 380 kg more than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Aston Martin DBR2 | 1997 Renault Helem | |
Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
Model | DBR2 | Helem |
Year Released | 1960 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 2975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 510 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1650 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 80 L |