1960 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Ram. (215 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 660 kg more than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2.
Because 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Dodge |
| Model | DBR2 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4164 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 76 L |
