1960 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (138 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 470 kg more than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Aston Martin | Nissan |
Model | DBR2 | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 84 L |