1960 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Tundra. (282 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 878 kg more than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Aston Martin | Toyota |
Model | DBR2 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 2148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 100 L |