1960 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2009 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2009 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Lincoln Navigator. (310 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Lincoln Navigator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 707 kg more than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2009 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Aston Martin | Lincoln |
Model | DBR2 | Navigator |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1977 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 127 L |