1960 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi TT weights approximately 230 kg more than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Aston Martin | Audi |
Model | DBR2 | TT |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4178 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1351 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 55 L |