1960 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Compass. (158 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Compass.
Because 1960 Aston Martin DBR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Aston Martin DBR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Aston Martin | Jeep |
Model | DBR2 | Compass |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 51 L |